0.06/0.15 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_22218 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.16/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 1440 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 180 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:09:53 EDT 2023 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.41/0.55 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Q2JbscPxpE/Vampire---4.8_22218 0.41/0.55 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.41/0.70 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.41/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # sh1 with pid 22397 completed with status 0 0.41/0.70 # Result found by sh1 0.41/0.70 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.41/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores 0.41/0.70 # No SInE strategy applied 0.41/0.70 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN 0.41/0.70 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh3 with 487s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh1 with 91s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 82s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting pre_casc_5 with 82s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh3l with 82s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # sh1 with pid 22404 completed with status 0 0.41/0.70 # Result found by sh1 0.41/0.70 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.41/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores 0.41/0.70 # No SInE strategy applied 0.41/0.70 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN 0.41/0.70 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh3 with 487s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Starting sh1 with 91s (1) cores 0.41/0.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s 0.41/0.70 0.41/0.70 # Proof found! 0.41/0.70 # SZS status Theorem 0.41/0.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_24, type, augmen1090971539pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > nat > nat > (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > list_P559422087at_nat > $o). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_28, type, isSimp1359852763pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > nat > list_P559422087at_nat > nat > $o). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_32, type, inf_in586391887at_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_33, type, set_Pr2131844118at_nat: list_P559422087at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_51, type, bot_bo2130386637at_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_60, type, converse_nat_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_64, type, residu203630698pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > product_prod_nat_nat > capacity). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_69, type, c: product_prod_nat_nat > capacity). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_70, type, f: product_prod_nat_nat > capacity). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_71, type, p: list_P559422087at_nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_72, type, s: nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(decl_73, type, t: nat). 0.41/0.70 thf(fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf, axiom, ![X3:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X18:nat, X5:list_P559422087at_nat, X19:nat]:(((isSimp1359852763pacity @ X3 @ X18 @ X5 @ X19)=>((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Q2JbscPxpE/Vampire---4.8_22218', fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf)). 0.41/0.70 thf(fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def, axiom, ![X5:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X5)<=>(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X5 @ t))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Q2JbscPxpE/Vampire---4.8_22218', fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def)). 0.41/0.70 thf(conj_1, conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Q2JbscPxpE/Vampire---4.8_22218', conj_1)). 0.41/0.70 thf(conj_0, hypothesis, (augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ p), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Q2JbscPxpE/Vampire---4.8_22218', conj_0)). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X1666:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X1667:nat, X1668:list_P559422087at_nat, X1669:nat]:((~(isSimp1359852763pacity @ X1666 @ X1667 @ X1668 @ X1669)|((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X1668) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X1668)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf])])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1283:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((~(augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X1283)|(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X1283 @ t))&(~(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X1283 @ t)|(augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X1283)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def])])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))!=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1])])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X3:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X4:nat, X5:list_P559422087at_nat, X6:nat]:((((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat))|~((isSimp1359852763pacity @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X5:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X5 @ t)|~((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))!=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X5:list_P559422087at_nat]:((((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X5)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat))|~((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_11, hypothesis, (augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ p), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0])). 0.41/0.70 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.41/0.70 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.41/0.70 # Parsed axioms : 338 0.41/0.70 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.41/0.70 # Initial clauses : 524 0.41/0.70 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 81 0.41/0.70 # Initial clauses in saturation : 443 0.41/0.70 # Processed clauses : 689 0.41/0.70 # ...of these trivial : 28 0.41/0.70 # ...subsumed : 269 0.41/0.70 # ...remaining for further processing : 392 0.41/0.70 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 86 0.41/0.70 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.41/0.70 # Backward-subsumed : 22 0.41/0.70 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.41/0.70 # Generated clauses : 2074 0.41/0.70 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1646 0.41/0.70 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.41/0.70 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.41/0.70 # Paramodulations : 1758 0.41/0.70 # Factorizations : 8 0.41/0.70 # NegExts : 13 0.41/0.70 # Equation resolutions : 100 0.41/0.70 # Total rewrite steps : 655 0.41/0.70 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional check models : 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.41/0.70 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.41/0.70 # Current number of processed clauses : 336 0.41/0.70 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 55 0.41/0.70 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2 0.41/0.70 # Negative unit clauses : 14 0.41/0.70 # Non-unit-clauses : 265 0.41/0.70 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1345 0.41/0.70 # ...number of literals in the above : 4341 0.41/0.70 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.41/0.70 # Current number of archived clauses : 33 0.41/0.70 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19304 0.41/0.70 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10942 0.41/0.70 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 238 0.41/0.70 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 892 0.41/0.70 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.41/0.70 # BW rewrite match attempts : 77 0.41/0.70 # BW rewrite match successes : 13 0.41/0.70 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.41/0.70 # Condensation successes : 0 0.41/0.70 # Termbank termtop insertions : 55843 0.41/0.70 0.41/0.70 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.41/0.70 # User time : 0.122 s 0.41/0.70 # System time : 0.012 s 0.41/0.70 # Total time : 0.134 s 0.41/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 4308 pages 0.41/0.70 0.41/0.70 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.41/0.70 # User time : 0.516 s 0.41/0.70 # System time : 0.041 s 0.41/0.70 # Total time : 0.556 s 0.41/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages 0.41/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting 0.41/0.71 EOF